|
Inside
the Tribunal in Salama After three years of bureaucratic
suspension and six months of hearings, five ex-civil patrollers were
sentenced to 780 years in prison by the Sentencing Tribunal in the
highland county of Salama on May 28.
The tribunal
found insufficient evidence to convict a sixth accused. The six have been
on trial for their participation in the massacre of 177 Maya-Achi women
and children from the village of Rio Negro in the county of Rabinal, Baja
Verapaz on March 13, 1982.
The massacre of
Rio Negro women and children is one of 626 documented massacres
perpetrated during the bloodiest of Latin America's civil wars in which
250,000 people were killed or disappeared. Guatemala's 36 year-long
internal armed conflict developed within the international context of the
cold war, lasting from 1960 to 1996. As part of Guatemala's Peace Accords,
the UN sponsored a truth commission report called the Commission for
Historical Clarification (CEH) which found the Guatemalan army and
paramilitary forces responsible for 93% of the atrocities.
Referring to
the CEH report, the Salama tribunal situated the Rio Negro case within
Guatemala's tragic history. At the height of the violence, between 1980
and 1983, the Guatemalan army designated the county of Rabinal as a
strategic region in an effort to combat the threat of "international
communism" posed by insurgent guerrilla combatants. The Guatemalan army
assumed that the indigenous civilian population was supporting the
guerrillas and thus defined them as an "internal enemy"; as such, they
were targeted for elimination.
As a part of
carrying out their strategy, in 1981 the army organized what they called
civilian self-defense patrols (Patrullas de Autodefensa Civil-PAC). The
PACs were paramilitary organizations in which mainly indigenous, civilian
men between the ages of 15-65 were forced to serve. The PACs patrolled
villages and the countryside for guerrilla insurgents and their civilian
supporters as well as accompanied the army on missions. At the height of
the violence, the Guatemalan army militarized about 1.5 million civilians
in the PACs. The six Maya-Achi men on trial were PAC members from the
village of Xococ, which neighbors Rio Negro.
Monument honoring those massacred in Rio Negro
After organizing the PACs, the army and the PACs carried out
various massacres of the civilian population in what became known as a
scorched-earth policy. In the early 1980s the county of Rabinal alone
experienced 28 massacres in which around 5000 people were killed
representing almost 20 percent of the population; according to the CEH
report 99.8% of the victims were indigenous Maya-Achi. The March 13, 1982
massacre in the village of Rio Negro was just one of five massacres
suffered by its inhabitants; totaling at least 444 assassinations of a
total population of around 800.
The five ex-PAC
members condemned for the March 13 Rio Negro massacre will only serve 30
of the 780 year sentence due to a 1969 law that sets the maximum penalty
for the crime of assassination at 30 years. The 780 years is a symbolic
act by the court which is the sum of 30 years for each of the 26
forensically identified victims from the massacre. In its closing
arguments, the prosecution requested a 5310 year sentence for each of the
accused-30 years for 177 total victims of the massacre.
During the
actual sentencing a court spokesperson read the names of the 26 identified
victims before condemning each of the five ex-civil patrollers to 780
years, finding them directly responsible for the crime of assassination.
The five guilty ex-patrollers are: Macario Alvarado Toj, Pablo Ruiz
Alvarado, Francisco Alvarado Lajuj, Tomas Vino Alvarado and Lucas Lajuj
Alvarado. Bonifacio Cuxum Lopez was acquitted.
Summing up
witness testimony, the tribunal cited the premeditated nature of the crime
and the intention of the Guatemalan army with the participation of civil
patrollers to kill the people of Rio Negro. The court declared the
testimony of the survivors "more than believable," a powerful declaration
in a country silenced by decades of fear and denial.
In addition to
the 30 year sentence, the guilty will have to pay civil reparations of
100,000 Quetzales (about $13,000) to the families of each of the 26
identified victims. Recognizing the evident poverty of the condemned
Maya-Achi men, the presiding judge said that it will be difficult for them
to actually pay this reparation.
Although the
sentencing of the ex-PAC members who participated in the Rio Negro
massacre may seem like a triumph for justice in Guatemala, they are
actually the least of the guilty parties. The civil patrollers are the
material authors of the massacre, those who carried out the orders coming
from the military chain of command. In other words they pulled the
trigger.
In this sense,
the condemnation of the five ex-PAC members is bittersweet for the Rio
Negro survivors. Empathizing with the condemned, one massacre survivor
said, "We are all human beings. They are just like us: poor and
indigenous. Their families will suffer because of their absence."
Highlighting the impunity that exists in Guatemala, a witness declared in
his testimony, "In this country justice is only applied if the accused are
indigenous. No one dares to prosecute the intellectual authors." The
intellectual authors are the military officers who planned and ordered the
massacres. In fact, not a single intellectual author of the
violence-dictators, army officers, police chiefs, etc.-has been brought to
trial, despite several ongoing cases against them. This same witness
concluded, "If our country is really a democracy, then shouldn't there be
equal access to Justice?"
Beyond sending
even more poor indigenous folks to jail, the Rio Negro witnesses hoped the
accused would reveal their knowledge about the military chain of command
to use in court against the officers who planned the violence.
Unfortunately, the ex-PAC members have maintained silence, and thus
fostered continued military impunity.
In fact, a
number of the Rio Negro witnesses are also witnesses in several cases
accusing two ex-dictators and their military high commands of genocide and
crimes against humanity. The witnesses are members of a national
organization of survivors from five of the hardest hit regions during the
violence called the Association for Justice and Reconciliation (AJR). The
AJR is a plaintiff in 3 national and international genocide cases that
have so far lingered in the initial investigative phase for seven
years.
In the Rio
Negro case, Captain Jose Antonio Solares Gonzalez was the ranking officer
at the Rabinal military base at the time of the massacre and was
responsible for this and numerous other massacres committed in the area.
Solares remains a fugitive from justice despite a pending arrest warrant
for his capture, which has not prevented him from collecting and cashing
his military pension checks. The Salama Tribunal reiterated the call for
his capture and trial, as well as that of two other ex-PAC members from
Xococ, Ambrosio Perez Lajuj and Domingo Chen.
In closing
remarks the presiding Judge acknowledged the pain and suffering of both
accusers and accused caused by the judicial process. Tacitly recognizing
the threats still faced by the witness from the family members of the
accused, he called for a peaceful return to everyday life after the
sentencing. The Judge implored that the sentence not bring more pain and
violence to both affected parties, as Guatemala and Rabinal in particular
have already suffered too much.
Kimberly
Kohler and Josh MacLeod are international human rights accompaniers living
in Guatemala. They work with the non-governmental organization the Network
in Solidarity with the People of Guatemala (NISGUA). They have been
accompanying the Rio Negro case since it recommenced December of
2007. |